Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Higgins's avatar

Dear Cloudcroft Reader,

I believe you should solicit ideas for solving the village’s water problems. I would like to begin by providing one I have not heard discussed.

It is apparently well known by many in the Forest Service how thirsty our trees are. Wikipedia says that fir trees drink and aspirate 10 gallons of water per day for each inch of trunk diameter. Thus, a 10” diameter fir tree will drink 100 gallons of water per day – about the same consumption as a typical household. We all love our trees – they are part of what makes Cloudcroft special - but the forest is overgrown. My suggestion is to hire a hydrologist to identify the bounds of the underground aquifer from which the village draws its water, and thin the forest above the aquifer in the region of its watershed. This will allow more of the surface water to make it to the aquifer. Thinning even 100 trees would add 10,000 additional gallons of water to the aquifer EACH DAY (on average). Additionally, thinning the forest would help mitigate the fire danger to the village and the trees that remain would become healthier. I would not think the Forest Service would object to the thinning on the watershed portions that fall on National Forest land.

Would thinning really work? I am compelled to relay a story told to me by the late Bill Mershon, who grew up in and spent his life in these mountains. Bill told me about an experiment in an area of mountains east of Cloudcroft. In this experiment, there were lots of dry springs identified on a hill. They thinned the forest on the hill and the springs all came back to life. Bill believed that we had allowed the forest to become woefully overgrown in the last 75 years.

Another efficiency related idea: Require all new homes or hotels to be plumbed with hot water recirculation systems. When I had my plumbing rebuilt 2 years ago, I had hot water recirculation installed and it is wonderful! I remember going to shower at my sister-in-law’s house. I would turn on the hot water and wait while 10’s of gallons went by before any hot water came out. I could go for breakfast and come back before getting hot water. With my hot water recirculation system, when I turn on the hot water, it is hot by the count of 1, 2, 3, saving a lot of water. We also installed new dual-flush toilets at the same time to save water (these should also be required).

However, there is a potential problem with making homes more water efficient – the sanitary sewer system has not been designed in advance for low flow, and sewer system problems could emerge if house water flow drops. I was told by one of the village operators that the sewer system should be flushed out periodically with 100 gallons of water discharged into the sewer near the top of the system. This would be a good use for any treated wastewater – to keep the sanitary sewer system healthy.

Regards, Bob Higgins

Expand full comment

No posts